|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
THE PROBLEM WITH POST-COLONIAL THEORY:
POSTCOLONIAL THEORY, from The Empire Strikes Back through Spivak’s Critique of Postcolonial Reason to Paul Gilroy’s Postcolonial Melancholia is a reaction to Western imperialist history and intellectual ideology. It is a spirited engagement with the structures of thinking and actions that facilitate the continued subordination, marginalization and exploitation of the intellectual resources and cultural reserves of the previously colonized peoples of the Western and non-Western worlds. It is also a subtle examination of the many and often conflicting strands that make up the postcolonial situation and identity. It seeks to dismantle the epistemologies of intellectual hegemony cultivated by the West via its academies as well as confront the ex-colonized with the options available for their critical redemption via alternative modes of discourse which may be different and antithetical in structure and content from those traditions of discourse fashioned by the West. In temperament, post-colonial theory differs from postmodern theory primarily in the sense that it often combines individual emotional commitment and outrage with a defiant optimism which is much more strident and activist than an acquiescent postmodernism. 1 We see this intensity in the scholarly work of Wole Soyinka, Biodun Jeyifo, Aime Cesaire, Franz Fanon, Trinh T. Minh-Ha, Rustom Barucha, Augusto Boal, Ngugi Wa Thiong’o, Henry Louis Gates, Coco Fusco, Guillerma Gomez-Pena, among many others. Click to Read More>>>www.sentinelpoetry.org.uk/slq2.1/esiaba_irobi.htm |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||